Hello to all!
Further to yesterday's talk, let's elaborate a little on it, although you probably are sick and tired of all this yammering! Well, feel free to stop reading any time you wish. Some of what I write you may think you have seen elsewhere. You may probably be right, except it is not plagiarism. I have taken a few ideas that I found interesting and put them in my own words. No problem.
Okay, back to the shiny new toy syndrome. The sad fact is it works with both adults and children, but how many of us actually follow a child's reasoning back to the beginning and play with the old toys once the 'new' has lost its gleam? Very few is the answer.
Say you have a fair system that, if you worked on it a bit, tweaked this and that, experimented, in other words, spent some time on it, may get you more money and traffic? Okay, that is called work. But the biggest companies in the world did not get that way because the founder or founders sat on their hands and said: It works great now, let's not improve it.
That should not be the way you view your business. There is absolutely no harm in seeing how far you can push the envelope before it falls off the table. Budget a little to do this with and try different things, while leaving the base alone. Maybe you could change to a more friendly host, ask a specialist blogger would they do a guest spot for you. Just small things that may or may not work, but you have at least given your business a chance to grow.
And everyone, rich or poor, has to have a point where they start from.
As long as you have that small leeway whereby you can afford to drop, say $10 or even $50, why not go for it? If you play pokies or something like that online, why not cut out whatever is your bet for just one day or weekend and invest that money in your business? You will get far better odds for doing this type of thing and your business may just get a start on growing. Besides, it is an investment, not a donation to a system that already has thousands or millions of monies from people who thought they would strike it rich with one jackpot and have simply contributed to that jackpot? Not really a fair deal by any means.
Friday, 7 December 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment